The New York Times Discovers Purim Torah

March 31, 2007 at 9:44 pm | In pesach, purim, torah | 1 Comment

My wife opined a few months ago that the New York Times has a terrible habit of being about a year behind on major trends, be it in fashion, technology, color printing, or popular culture. While not quite so far behind this time, I did enjoy their article on the “kosher for Passover” gasoline story that I posted about in this space near Purim.

In This Town, Talk Turns to Putting the Volvos on a Kosher Diet – New York Times

I’ve just kashered my kitchen, but there’s always more to do! Chag Kasher V’Sameach.

Oh, by the way, I asked earlier about why we have this story about having no time to bake bread because we were in such a rush to leave Egypt when God clearly commands Moshe weeks earlier to prepare the Jews to bring the Korban Pesach, and to eat it with Matzah and Marror. So go look at the pesukim, and you’ll find that Moshe never passes the command to eat Matzah to the Jews. Interesting, no? It seems like Moshe sets it up so that the Jews will end up with Matzah. I don’t get it, but I plan to ask about it at my seder!

Ach, Zionism!

March 26, 2007 at 4:11 pm | In beliefs, politics | 2 Comments

A few weeks ago, a friend of mine, an Israeli who came to the US in search of a better education, better lifestyle, and better opportunities for the family he hoped to build, sent me an article. Many of you have probably seen it. It’s called “This Place Called Hope”, by Daniel Gordis.

I had put off reading it for some time. It was long, it starts with a story about a doctor’s office – it just wasn’t appealing and I didn’t want to have to get into the whole Israel issue again. It’s so frustrating, and it’s a topic which regularly divides my closest friendships. But I was going through my email box, doing a bit of virtual Pesach cleaning, when I came across the article, and I read it. Like other writers, Gordis talks passionately about the shortcomings of Zionism. I found the following to be his most insightful thoughts:

A century ago (approximately), the early political Zionists believed that having a country would normalize the condition of the Jew in the world. The Jews were singled out, people like Herzl and Nordau (and many others) believed, because there was something un-natural about a people not having a home. Poles had Poland, the Italians had Italy. If the Jews had a country, then finally, the condition of the Jew (being everywhere but being at home no where) would change. And the world would eventually cease its relentless attention on this tiny fraction of the world’s population.

But that, of course, has not happened either. Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Darfur – all conflicts that have taken infinitely more lives than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – receive nowhere near the attention that Israel does. Thousands are raped and butchered in Darfur, and days go by with scarcely a mention in the world’s papers. There are 200,000 child soldiers in Sierra Leone alone, but who even knows about that? Yet one protester ignores IDF warnings to stay out of the way and accidentally gets crushed by a bulldozer, and the world goes ape.

Anyway, I responded to my friend who sent me the article, and at his urging I’m am publishing my response to him in full:

That was a good article, but I disagree with it about one major point.

Zionism is dying because it never had a purpose beyond surviving. After the Holocaust, what Jews wanted was the ability to fight back – to have a place they could run to, and a place they could fight back from. It didn’t matter what kind of Jew you were, every Jew was in Hitler’s cross-hairs, and every Jew needed a state where Jews could go.

That simple idea started to die in 1967, and by 1990, when Israel’s warplanes remained grounded as Iraqi Scud missiles struck the heartland, it was dead. Israel was not just a place where people who had nothing to lose could give up everything to fight for survival. It was a nation with people who wanted something better for their children than fear and a gun.

We don’t need to bring back Zionism. It’s a flawed ideology, in my opinion. For 2000 years, Jews were defined by Nation and God, but they were without land. Zionism sought to redefine Jews as Nation and Land, without God. But the conflicts we face today are all about God. If we are not a Chosen People, if we do not have some kind of religious claim to our land that is more important even than historical claims, then we have no good argument for settling in Israel and displacing the Arabs that lived there before we returned. We need to incorporate the traditional tripod of Jewish identity – Am, Eretz, V’Elohim: Nation, Land, and God.

We need an ideology that says: Israel is important because we are the bridge between East and West religiously, geographically, politically, and morally. We can be a path for communication, understanding, and reconciliation, or we can be the battlefield on which the two sides clash. So far, we’ve only managed the latter – isn’t time we try the former?

Kosher Gasoline Spill

March 20, 2007 at 11:05 am | In halacha, holidays, pesach | Leave a Comment

Last week, I wrote a post about the sale of Kosher-for-Pesach gasoline in Teaneck. The article I cited was, of course, not factual, and was simply making the rounds for Purim. I confess that at the time I posted it I suspected, but was not certain, that this was the case. Besides, I figured it would make for good fun in either case. After all, on its face, the prohibition on gasoline seemed no more or less farcical than the prohibition on water from the Kinneret (because fisherman fish in it with bread or other chametz), or the prohibition on Brooklyn water because of non-kosher organisms that needed to be filtered out.

Since then, the article, ostensibly published in the non-existent Bergen County Jewish Times, has made its way out of the small Jewish pond. I encountered it today at one of the most popular economics blogs on the web, Marginal Revolution. It appears that they too, were taken in, as they quoted the fake article in their ‘Markets in Everything’ feature.

How did MR get wind of this? They credit Brendan Nyhan, who runs a fine political blog, but I could not find any mention of this article on his blog – Brendan, if you see this, do you mind posting in the comments about how you got the article, and what made you send it on to MR? In any case, Marginal Revolution was eventually clued in to the humorous nature of the article, and to their credit, they posted a link to Rabbi Mark Ankorn’s debunking of the story.

I don’t know if this story comes with a moral, but its worth noting how quickly our meshugas reaches outside of the walls of our parish and into the broader world.

I Dream of Harry

March 19, 2007 at 6:59 pm | In beliefs, jewish denominations, orthodox | 3 Comments

Though I read him regularly, I confess that Harry Maryles and I don’t often see eye-to-eye on issues of hashkafah. I was delighted then, when Reb Maryles, in what I can only describe as a John Lennon moment, published a post on his blog, Emes Ve-Emunah, calling for Jewish unity, which he aptly entitled Imagine.

As I have pointed out in the past, many non-Orthodox movements are rejecting the rejectionist ways of their forebearers and are incorporating many of the trappings once reserved for only the most Orthodox of Jewry. Reform Rabbis are now wearing Kipot once anathema to them, and urging Mitzvah observance albeit not mandatorily and have even established Kollelim… as a way perpetuating their existence. Both the Conservative and Reform movements now have their own elementary schools and the Conservatives even have their own high schools. While it is true that the Conservatives are in the midst of an identity crisis, it may yet self resolve because of this new and apparently successful phenomenon.

So what was once an “orthodoxy” of the American secular Jewish mindset to totally assimilate out of Jewish practice is now almost an apostasy. They have done an almost complete 180. And that’s a good thing. Secular Jewry has seen the fruit of old policies. Dropping observance has turned into intermarriage and many Jews hardly identify at all as Jews and have virtually no Jewish identity. The once predicted demise of Orthodox Jewry has morphed into an emulation of Orthodox practices.

I thought, after reading these paragraphs, that surely Rabbi Maryles would reach across the aisle (which is easier when there’s no mechitza) and shake hands with the reforming Reform movement, and the tradition-conserving Conservative movement, in an effort to build dialogue and relationships with these brethren who were estranged from Orthodoxy.

No such luck. Rabbi Maryles may have brought up other denominations, but like many Orthodox Jews, his horizons are defined by a sort of ideological tchum shabbat – if you don’t keep Shabbat, you’re not within his purview. It turns out that Reb Harry’s actual problem is Orthodox Jewish sectarianism, not Jewish sectarianism as a whole.

But there’s a fly in the ointment. All is not well in candyland… We cannot be content to celebrate our successes and move forward in unison. We instead quite because of our success, fight amongst ourselves. Instead of uniting in common cause in Orthodox brotherhood, we have taken to factionalizing and narrowing our circles so as to exclude those with whom we have even the slightest of differences.

It is one thing to reject extremism that might be on the fringes of both ends of the Orthodox spectrum. I could understand drawing those lines and draw them myself. But we have come to a point where we are drawing our circles smaller and smaller in an effort to more narrowly define what we believe to be authentic Judaism. And in the process we do more harm to ourselves as a whole than we gain in our subsets.

I’m sure I don’t agree that Orthodox sectarianism is as a result of the success of the Orthodox movement as a whole. I don’t think the Orthodox movement has been successful at all – only about one-third of Jews are Orthodox, whereas before the Haskala, the Jewish Enlightenment, nobody disputes that whatever the precise numbers were, the overwhelming majority of Jews practiced their traditional faith in a manner most similar to Orthodoxy today.

Reb Harry concludes with a excerpt from an article by Rabbi Emanuel Feldman, whom he cites earlier (full text of R. Feldman in Jewish Action available from OU.org):

A Jewish fantasy: An emergency joint task force of the leadership of the Orthodox Union and other MO institutions, and of Agudath Israel and other YO institutions, is established. It has a single, circumscribed purpose: It will focus on ways to fight the onslaught of Jewish ignorance and intermarriage. Neither group necessarily accepts the others’ worldview; perspectives on Torah and Jewish life remain unchanged. But in this critical eit la’asot situation—and in fulfillment of the words of the Talmud Yerushalmi in Sotah (7:4), and of Ramban (Devarim 27:26), that those who are able to influence others to be loyal to Torah and do not care to do so, do not find favor in the eyes of our Creator—stereotypes and intolerance are put aside, and resources and energies are combined for this single objective.

Imagine the electric impact on the Jewish world even of such a limited cooperation.

On the one hand, I would welcome additional Orthodox involvement in the rest of the Jewish world. But given the attitudes prevalent throughout Orthodoxy about how to relate and reach out to non-Orthodox Jews, I have grave doubts about the success of this emergency task force.

For Orthodox Jews to effectively influence non-Orthodox movements, they must abandon the paternalistic, condescending attitude they have towards non-Orthodox Jews. This is a particularly tall order since Orthodox Judaism, despite its farcical level of internecine conflict, still purports to possess actual absolute truth, and possessors of absolute truth are notorious for their superior attitudes towards those of us who are still cognizant of the magnitude of our ignorance. In any case, openness is a two-way street, and the Orthodox must be prepared to be changed if they wish to effect change in other denominations. But the Orthodox are too afraid for the fragile, crystalline purity of their own movement and its truths to dare expose it to the proving ground of interdenominational relationships.

[Edit: Maybe there is hope - Hamodia publishes tips on hosting non-religious Jews at the Pesach seder. Hat tip to Yaakov Menken at Cross-Currents.)

Shooting the Messenger

March 17, 2007 at 8:49 pm | In politics | Leave a Comment

I haven’t done much politics in this space, and barring another Israeli conflict, I intend to do very much. Then again, I don’t intend to do much motzei Shabbat posting, but here we are.

Over the past year, there has been a campaign to remove all sorts of politicians, bureaucrats, and military intelligence officials from their posts. This, in response to the now-obvious flaws, misapprehensions, and downright deceptions in the pre-Iraq-war planning and ramp-up.

On its face, this seems eminently reasonable. Failures on this scale lead to waves of finger-pointing, investigations, dismissals, lawsuits, cover-ups, and the whole suite of blame-passing, obfuscations, fall-guyism, and suprise discharges that make up political life. To what extent any truth is uncovered, errors are corrected, or guilty parties are held accountable is something we’ll never truly know, but it’s nice to see that everyone is at least going through the motions with some energy and passion.

I am left with one question though. A recurrent theme of the re-tellings of the ramp-up to war is the quiescent Washington press corps, whose members were cowed into uncritically accepting the White House’s political conclusions and military strategies. Many news organizations stepped forward around the time of the 2004 elections with chest-pounding confessions about their failures in the post-9/11 journalism climate.

It would stand to reason then that an institution like the news media, having confessed to its lapses and failures in what should have been its finest hour, would follow confession with some self-flagellation! Did any journalist get fired or reassigned as part of an attempt to fix the journalistic failings we witnessed since 9/11? Has any bureau chief, editor, or corporate department head lost a job? I have not heard of a wave of reform sweeping though the news media – have you? Makes you think…

[Edit - Krum as a Bagel suggests that the administration was engaging in a "noble exaggeration" when they trumpeted the case for war in Iraq. You'll have to check his blog out to find out what that has to do with Al Gore.]

Pesach Chumra Competition Off To A Mindboggling Start

March 14, 2007 at 3:39 pm | In halacha, orthodox, pesach | 3 Comments

When I said I was going to post about Pesach this isn’t what I had in mind.

The Bergen County Jewish Times (no link to the original, couldn’t find one – hope this isn’t a hoax… or maybe I hope it is a hoax, I’ll let you decide) is reporting that a local gas station owner will be selling Kosher-For-Pesach gas!

Yaniv Ban-Zaken, a local gas station owner, will be selling Kosher for Passover gasoline during the holiday this year. The move, Ben-Zaken says,has become necessary due to the increased ethanol content in gasoline required by the government. The ethanol is typically derived from corn, which is a forbidden food for Jews on Passover. And, according to Ben-Zaken, underJewish law, it is also forbidden to derive any benefit from corn.

Interested? It’ll cost you. A gallon of chametz- (or rather, kitniyot-) free gas will set you back a staggering $9.69 per gallon. Still, compared to a pound of hand-made shmura matzah, a gallon of chametz-free gas is pretty cheap – a pound of shmura will go for about $18, and all you get is some hastily-baked flour and water! I wonder what’s more expensive, feeding matzah to your family of eight, or driving them all to Great Adventure on Chol HaMoed in your Suburban, Navigator, or Odyssey.

But why take psak from a non-observant yored? Rabbi Mordechai Silver of Yeshivas Torah Ohr in Englewood says:

[W]hile it might technically be acceptable to use mass-produced gasoline, those who can afford to purchase the new alternative should. “In Jewish law, we have a principle of lifnim mshuras hadin–going above and beyond the basic requirements of the law,” he explained in an email. “Thank G-d, many people in the area can afford to do so in this case.”

A cynic might argue that there’s no chiyuv to line the pockets of your local gas-station owner on Pesach, but Mr. Ban Zaken claims that he won’t turn a profit on this venture at all, and that he’s just providing a community service.

In fairness, not everyone thinks this is such a great idea:

Rabbi Shalom Silver, of Congregation Ohel Emeth in Teaneck , has recommended to his congregants that they not buy the gasoline. “Although Jews of Ashkenazi descent are not permitted to eat corn on Pesach, they are permitted to derive benefit from corn byproducts, such as gasoline with ethanol additives,” he said.

And to think, if I was only born a Sephardi I could have been sitting on the sidelines and laughing about all this!

Hat tip to Torn

What Does God Have To Do With Judaism, Anyway?

March 13, 2007 at 8:12 pm | In beliefs, jewish denominations | 13 Comments

While the j-blogosphere (God, I hate that word… it’s one of those words that looks fine on paper,but when you open your mouth to say it, you feel like an ass) is alive with arguments over the principles of Jewish faith, I marvel again at the gap between Orthodoxy and, well, mainstream American Judaism.

Mik Moore at J-Spot.org cites a study showing that fully 52% of American Jews do not believe in God!! In fairness, only about 19% actively disbelieved, while another 33% were uncertain about whether God did or did not exist. Still, that 19% means that there are five times as many Jewish atheists as compared to Protestant atheists.

When you consider how much ink, both real and virtual, has been spilled by contemporary Orthodox (and near-Orthodox) rabbis, philosophers, thinkers, professors, and bloggers over the Rambam’s Thirteen Ikarim (Principles of Faith), and the extent to which they define Judaism (or Orthodox Judaism, or Torah-True Judaism, ad infinitum, ad nauseum), the image that most readily comes to mind is that of Nero fiddling while Rome burned.

Forget the thirteen ikarim! Let’s start with the first: to know that there is a God! We can disagree over what it means to know that there is a God, or to be commanded to believe that there is a God. We didn’t have to wait for Maimonides to let us in on this fundamental Jewish belief. It’s the first of the Ten Commandments!

With due respect to Mr. Moore, who doesn’t “actually believe the Jewish community has a continuity crisis, stemming from intermarriage or atheism or anything else”, I believe that while you may be Jewish without believing in God, you’re not behaving Jewish if you don’t even believe in God.

I’ve seen atheists and agnostics describe themselves as Jewish – actually, in the recent interview in the Biblical Archeology Review that I posted about, noted archaeologist William Dever, a convert to Reform Judaism, says he is agnostic. To me, there is no such thing as a Jewish denomination that rejects God. Yes, there may be a culture group that is inspired by Jewish religion and shares ties with people of that faith, and who use the word Jewish to describe themselves. But, at least as I understand it, they are not behaving in a sustainable Jewish manner, and they can have no claim to represent a Jewish ideology.
In other words, the reverse of Mik Moore: failure to believe in God is not sustainable for a differentiated Jewish social group over the long run. It is at least a contributing factor to intermarriage, if not a primary cause. And outside of the Land of Israel, it leads only to assimilation.

Maybe it’s time that those of us who see Judaism as a religion first, and share a commitment to a God we do believe in, even if we sometimes harbor doubts, identify ourselves differently. Rather than squabbling over who gets to keep the name “Jew”, let’s reach back into our past and our tradition, and identify ourselves with our Biblical forebears, who were proud to call themselves Bnai Yisrael. It was the very sons of Israel, the Twelve Tribes of Jacob, who first called out the Jewish catechism of faith that no longer unites us all, the Shema: Hear O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one! I’m done being a Jew, a word with a short, ignoble history in the English language. I’m an Israelite!

Links Roundup

March 13, 2007 at 11:14 am | In beliefs, dating and marriage, holidays, jewish denominations, links roundup, orthodox, other faiths, pesach | Leave a Comment

Some interesting links I’ve stumbled across recently:

Should you set up a not-so-observant-but-Orthodox guy with a really frum Conservative girl? As much as I enjoyed the question, I think the best part was the disconnect between admitting that the Conservative girl was more religious than the Orthodox guy and this paragraph:

That there are so many Conservative Jews who are serious about their observance should be seen as a challenge to us. It is all too easy to say that our Kiruv efforts should be geared to those whose knowledge of Torah Judaism is negligible. That’s what the NCSYs and Aish HaTorahs do. But what about this young woman and others like her? Can we afford to just leave them alone? Should we perhaps be interacting more with them? Can we entice them away from the heresy that is the Conservative movement into the Emes of an Orthodox one? Is there Kiruv for them? And how would we do it? Is there anyone or any group doing it?

I fully agree that the existence of frum Conservatives challenges Orthodox assumptions and positions. But what’s funny is that Harry Marlyes (the author) completely misses that the person needing kiruv is not the frum Conservative, but the disaffected Orthodox!

[From Emes V'emunah]

Best Fatwah Ever!

Reconstructive hymen surgery for women who lost their virginity before marriage is halal (religiously permissible), said to Aly Gomaa, the Grand Mufti of Egypt.

Gomaa, the highest authority with the power to issue a fatwa (religious edict), appeared the popular terrestrial Channel Two’s talk show El Beit Beitek, where he condoned the controversial fatwa, released by Soad Saleh, the ex-dean of the faculty of Islamic studies at Al-Azhar University and noted scholar.

Shiekh Khaled El Gindy, an Al-Azhar scholar and member of the Higher Council of Islamic Studies told The Daily Star Egypt that he agrees with the new fatwa.

“Islam never differentiates between men and women, so it is not rational for us to think that God has placed a sign to indicate the virginity of women without having a similar sign to indicate the virginity of men,” El Gindy said.

“Any man who is concerned about his prospective wife’s hymen should first provide a proof that he himself is virgin,” he added.

[From the Daily Star Egypt]

The Rebbe’s partying with Elvis, but 770 lives on – check out this exhibit of various 770-clones around the world. There was an exhibit of many of these photos at the Jewish Museum a year or two ago, but it’s gone now. [Hat tip - Kottke.org]

Supposedly, there’s a native Jew who is blogging from Mogadishu, Somalia. I hate to sound cynical, but I have my doubts as to whether it’s the real deal or not. In some places the writing sounds juvenile, while in others it is strangely fluent. Dunno. I leave it to you to to judge.

A question to ponder: The Torah tells us, and the Haggadah repeats for us, that the Jews made matzah on their way out of Egypt because they had no time to allow their bread to rise:

 
ט וַיֹּאפוּ אֶת-הַבָּצֵק אֲשֶׁר הוֹצִיאוּ מִמִּצְרַיִם, עֻגֹת מַצּוֹת–כִּי לֹא חָמֵץ: כִּי-גֹרְשׁוּ מִמִּצְרַיִם, וְלֹא יָכְלוּ לְהִתְמַהְמֵהַּ, וְגַם-צֵדָה, לֹא-עָשׂוּ לָהֶם. 39 And they baked unleavened cakes of the dough which they brought forth out of Egypt, for it was not leavened; because they were thrust out of Egypt, and could not tarry, neither had they prepared for themselves any victual.

Exod. 12:39

However, a few verses prior, in the very same chapter, God tells Moshe that the Jewish people should select a lamb for slaughter on the 10th of Nisan, and that they will eat it five days later with Matzah! If there was enough time to prepare a lamb barbecue with matzah and marror, surely there was enough time to bake some bread for the journey out of Egypt! What gives?

Jewish Education: Doing a Better Job

March 12, 2007 at 2:45 am | In beliefs, education, jewish denominations, torah | 7 Comments

Lenny at JSpot.org recently posted about his dissatisfaction with how progressive Jewish organizations do text studies. His complaint is that these organizations are using the texts, not teaching the texts. Because most of these text studies are accessories to a particular political, charitable, or moral campaign, they come off as predigested pap. Educators preselect texts and commentaries that support their goals, essentially drawing a bullseye around the dart of their political and moral beliefs. These sessions can feel artificial and demoralizing. In Lenny’s words, “Finding excerpts that support my predisposition seems to do more to comfort me in my superficial Jewishness and little to deeply engage me with Judaism.”

To address this problem, Lenny proposes:

…doing away with such one-time self-congratulatory events and moving to an ongoing Jewish adult education courses that more deeply engage us with our rich tradition.

A Jewish adult education course would not start with the brash assumption that we will find the answer that we want to hear in the text. Rather, such a course would be a more open-ended inquiry into our ancient and sometimes contradictory history. It would uncover the major debates about a particular topic (e.g. treatment of workers), teach the participants about the major compilations of literature that capture those debates, and trace the evolution of Jewish thinking over time and space.

On the one hand, I salute Lenny’s vision. Unfortunately, as I commented to his post, in the non-Orthodox world, Jewish adults simply don’t have the keys to access the treasury of Jewish learning, and because of that, they just don’t attend ongoing adult education classes. I teach in a nondenominational Hebrew high school program, and when I first started teaching there, I was stunned by the paucity of Jewish knowledge possessed by my students. Once, I asked a class of twenty students to tell me about Noah, and not a single one could answer – not even the student named Noah!

Outside of Orthodoxy, Jewish adults have a limited grasp of Hebrew (written and spoken), a lack of significant exposure to fundamental texts, and an almost total ignorance of the great Jewish thinkers of the last two thousand years. Whereas Orthodox students will have learned much, if not all, of Chumash (The Five Books of Moses) with Rashi and other commentators, as well as selected books from the Prophets and Writings, a few representative chapters of Talmud with advanced commentary, and assorted other books of Halacha, Mussar, and Jewish philosophy, there is, broadly speaking, no such parallel in the Conservative or Reform movements.

That’s the problem, pure and simple. I don’t know how it happened, but somewhere, the value of intensive Jewish education was lost from these movements, and the results are a laity that doesn’t know what Jewish learning is, and as a result, has very low expectations of Jewish education, and an even lower sense of responsibility to seek out and commit to consistent, high-quality Jewish learning.

As Lenny correctly surmised, I do believe that Hebrew schools need to focus on basic texts instead of ’soft’ Judaism. But that’s not enough. The problem is not just that our focus is wrong, it’s that we are under-committed. We can’t send our kids to Hebrew school for five or six hours a week for about four years and expect any depth out of the experience. How many weeks per year does a Hebrew school meet? Maybe twenty-five? So a Jewish child gets about five hundred hours at Hebrew school over the course of four years – the equivalent of about twelve weeks of working full-time. It’s just not enough time, and we all know it! To borrow from The Big Lebowski, three thousand years of tradition from Moses to Sandy Koufax, and you want me to fit it into how long?!?

In the Orthodox world, it is a mark of honor and distinction to be known as a Jew who “knows how to learn.” Such a person can walk into a Beit Midrash, or a shul library, open a Jewish text he has never seen before, and decipher its meaning. It’s more than the ability to translate Hebrew (and Aramaic!) into English. It’s not just reading and grasping the plot of a particular parsha. It’s a whole world of meta-knowledge – which commentator is a literalist, which can help you with a grammar problem, and which will address the ethical or theological issues raised by a verse. It’s a familiarity with the Jewish bookshelf, and with major streams of Jewish thought. It’s the ability to swim in the sea of Talmud, explore the tributary streams of a religious idea, and emerge on the banks of a new understanding of your faith, your life, and your choices. This kind of learning, this kind of dedication is what leads to an ownership over Jewish text and tradition, and it need not and should not be the sole realm of Orthodoxy.

The problem facing the liberal Jewish community is much broader than the question of how to do better text studies, or even why Jewish social and political organizations should be doing adult Jewish education at all!

The problem is that liberal Jews send their children to public school, not Jewish day school. The Hebrew school programs that these Jewish children attend struggle with the Sisyphean task of teaching Judaism amid all the distractions of school, friends, family, extra-curricular activities, sports, and so forth (in my own school I have students whom I only see in the autumn, because they play softball in the spring, and students I only seen in spring because they play football in the fall). Kids are very savvy to priorities, and they learn that Hebrew school, Jewish knowledge, and attendance at synagogue aren’t really that important! What kind of adults will these children be? I submit that they will be no different from their parents, and like their parents, they will have limited interest in, and limited patience for authentic Jewish learning.

 
ד תּוֹרָה צִוָּה-לָנוּ, מֹשֶׁה: מוֹרָשָׁה, קְהִלַּת יַעֲקֹב . 4 Moses commanded us the Torah, an inheritance of the congregation of Jacob.

(Deut. 33:4)

Knowledge of Torah is the heritage of the Jewish people. If a liberal Jewish organization is just another liberal organization, but for its Jewish content, then what are the liberal Jewish people if not for their Jewish content? Unless the Conservative and Reform communities elevate education to the top of their lists of priorities, they will cede the very definition of Judaism to the Orthodox on one hand, and to the political fashions of the day on the liberal side of the ideological spectrum on the other. Without a grounding in the texts with which our tradition and culture is intertwined, we have no religion, no culture, and no identity.

What’s With Open Orthodoxy?

March 11, 2007 at 7:22 pm | In beliefs, ethics, jewish denominations, orthodox | 2 Comments

I was about to get all fired up about Mark Einhorn’s continued attacks on Yeshivat Chovevei Torah, and YCT grad Rabbi Darren Kleinberg, when I realized that even I’m not that interested in this topic.

Still, I noticed while on Einhorn’s blog, that he has bought out the domain name OpenOrthodoxy.com, .net, .org, and OpenOrthodox.com, .net, and .org. While many companies defend their brand names by purchasing all possible domains that might relate to them, it’s a little odd to see Einhorn doing the same.

There’s certainly nothing illegal about what Einhorn has done, and if you’re trying to get noticed on the Internet, having many domain names pointing to your site is advantageous. I think that what bothers me the most about this is that Einhorn does not embrace an Open Orthodox ideology. He claims that his blog is “Where Open Orthodoxy Ends: Your final destination for open review of fringe Orthodox Judaism.”

Anyone want to guess what he means by “Where Open Orthodoxy Ends” ? Anyone want to square that phrase with the claims that his blog is an “open review of fringe Orthodox Judaism” ? Compound that with the fact that Einhorn’s blog does not accept comments, and it becomes clear that his “open review” is the opposite – a closed canon of disdain for Open Orthodoxy.

With Pesach almost upon us, I think it’s time to leave this issue behind. Stay tuned for some posts on the Haggadah over the next week.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.