R. Eliyahu Advances Final Solution to Palestinian Problem: Carpet Bombing
May 31, 2007 at 5:13 pm | In ethics, israel, politics | Leave a CommentAs my loyal readers know (and I assume that means all of you), I don’t talk much about politics, domestic or Israeli on this blog. It just seems like in real life, political arguments can lead to new knowledge, a change in viewpoints – all the normal benefits of the free exchange of trusted information. Online, these debates lead nowhere, no matter how well-intentioned the participants.
Recent comments by Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu, Chief Sephardic Rabbi of Israel, have forced my hand, if only because I believe that it is the responsibility of every person of moral conscience to repudiate the horrors contemplated by R. Eliyahu.
As reported by the Jerusalem Post, Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu wrote a letter to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert indicating that the correct response to rocket attacks on the border town of Sderot is the collective punishment of the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. An excerpt:
Eliyahu ruled that there was absolutely no moral prohibition against the indiscriminate killing of civilians during a potential massive military offensive on Gaza aimed at stopping the rocket launchings.
<snip>
According to Jewish war ethics, wrote Eliyahu, an entire city holds collective responsibility for the immoral behavior of individuals. In Gaza, the entire populace is responsible because they do nothing to stop the firing of Kassam rockets.
Putting aside the dubious claim that nobody in the entire Gaza Strip has taken action to stop rocket attacks or foster peace between Israel and the Palestinians, I’m somewhat concerned by the careless conflation of all the population centers of the Gaza Strip into one ‘city’ whose entire populace is collectively responsible. Their is an aspect of dehumanization to lumping separate people together into one general, hated group. We saw it after 9/11, where Americans, filled with anger and a desire for vengeance, could barely distinguish a Sikh from a Muslim, much less an Afghan from an Iraqi, or a Sunni from a Shiite. We’ve seen it from many right-wing Israelis, who claim that “they” don’t want peace, or that “the Arabs all hate us” – not even realizing how offensively boorish they sound when they cite the Iranian president’s vicious comments as proof (Iranians are ethnically Persians, not Arabs, and are heirs to an ancient, powerful, and proud culture that has often clashed with Arab culture).
What’s worse was R. Eliyahu’s son’s clarifying comments after his father declined to be interviewed:
Shmuel Eliyahu, who is chief rabbi of Safed, said his father opposed a ground troop incursion into Gaza that would endanger IDF soldiers. Rather, he advocated carpet bombing the general area from which the Kassams were launched, regardless of the price in Palestinian life.
“If they don’t stop after we kill 100, then we must kill a thousand,” said Shmuel Eliyahu. “And if they do not stop after 1,000 then we must kill 10,000. If they still don’t stop we must kill 100,000, even a million. Whatever it takes to make them stop.”
What would be the consequences of this evil choice? Would Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank be cowed after a few tens of thousands of their fellows were exterminated? What about the regional damage? My guess is that Jordan would be torn by strife and revolt, as the Palestinians who makeup the majority of the population react to the tragedy. I imagine that Hezbollah and Syria would also respond violently, with Iran right behind them. Around the world, Israel would face condemnation, sanctions, and utter isolation. Even America could not back such a slaughter, and not even Aipac could stop the cutbacks in Israeli aid or the barring of sale of hi-tech weaponry to Israel, already endangered by cluster-bombing in Lebanon. I think that this action would result in the greatest Chillul Hashem (desecration of God’s name) in perhaps all of Jewish history.
I’ve gone on the record with my opinion because I feel it is my responsibility to do so, and to reject Rabbi Eliyahu. I would support any effort to remove him from his position within the government, and from within the religious leadership, and I call upon Jewish and Israeli leaders worldwide to condemn him and distance themselves from his remarks. (Surprisingly, my calls to world leaders usually go unanswered… I though bloggers had power!) What about you folks out there? How do you feel about R. Eliyahu’s comments?
How Many Jews is Enough?
May 9, 2007 at 5:37 pm | In beliefs, torah | 7 CommentsThe world Jewish population stands at about 13 million today. At the Exodus, the Torah tells us that there were 600,000 men aged 20-60. Estimating from that figure (and yes, taking it literally, for the moment), we can conjecture that about 2-3 million Jews left Egypt. A few hundred years prior, the Jewish family embraced only 70 members, and only a little while before that, it numbered only Abraham and Sarah.
Abraham was promised that his children would be uncountably numerous, like the sands of the beach or the stars of the sky. The Milky Way galaxy contains anywhere from 100 billion to 500 billion stars. According to mathematicians at the University of Hawaii, there are 7.5 quintiliion(yep, as in million, billion, trillion, quadrillion, quintillion) grains of sand on earth.
Ok, so it’s not likely that God meant this one literally, hence my question: How many Jews is enough? Can we at any point say that God has fulfilled his promise to Abraham?
How Democracy Defeated God
May 9, 2007 at 7:16 am | In beliefs, science | 3 CommentsThat’s what I’d title the book I would write if I wasn’t so busy with making up excuses about how I’m too busy to write this blog, much less a book that’s probably 8th or 9th on my list of books I’d like to write “someday”.
My theory is that for all that developments in science have made it less reasonable, desirable, or practical to believe in a God whose existence accounts for the inexplicable, it was not science, but democracy, which have truly empowered the atheism of the Western world. Though the US remains a notable holdout, in general, Western democracies are atheistic. In the past religion offered both the cultural glue of shared experiences, beliefs, and expectations about world, as well as the rules and norms for interacting within society. Democracy largely supplanted these roles fro religion, leaving to priests and rabbis the role of cheerleading for morality rather than enforcing it.
It turns out that religion did a fine job of exercising power and exerting control, but it did a pretty lousy job of governing societies justly or providing opportunities for individuals. Turns out that democracies do a far better job at ensuring the rights of individuals, lifting up the downtrodden, protecting the powerless, and governing disputes. With democracy providing an effective moral code, many people are simply shrugging their shoulders at God and moving on.
Maybe later I’ll talk about why I think this is a mistake, but I’d love to hear from some of you guys first.
Halachics of Kashrut
May 3, 2007 at 10:36 am | In halacha, jewish ethics, kosher | 2 CommentsAnother post in the Halachics series – perhaps I should organize them into some kind of category.
Like most bloggers, I keep an eye on lots of blogs, but I only read a select few religiously (no pun intended). Among my favorites is the Kosher Blog, which combines recipes and restaurant reviews with reporting on the kashrut industry. Recently Jonathan Abbet, the blog-owner, posted his notes on a lecture given by Rabbi Moshe Heinemann, a Rabbinic Administrator at the Star-K. I want to turn my attention to some of the issues R. Heinemann discussed.
The first issue covered at the lecture was the upcoming Shemitta year, and its impacts on the produce market. During Shemitta, produce grown on Jewish-owned land in Israel may not be sold commercially to other Jews, and as such, will not get a hechsher. In order to meet demand, companies contract with Arab farmers for their produce, grown on their land. Normally, there is not much demand for Arab produce, and it is usually much cheaper than the more in-demand Jewish produce. However, every Shemitta year, demand for Arab produce skyrockets, and Arab farmers are often not prepares to meet the demand. Since the price of Jewish produce plummets during Shemitta, Arab farmers will often meet shortfalls in their supply by purchasing and re-selling Jewish produce.
According to R. Heinemann, their actions undermine the efforts to respect the Shemitta year. What’s interesting is what the Star-K has decided to do about this issue. I nearly fell out of my chair when I read it:
[T]he Star-K has contracted with a French satellite company to take pictures of Arab farms every five minutes to discover any illicit deliveries of Jewish produce. The image resolution is high enough that a truck’s license plate can be read, and appropriate action may be taken.
I guess if you’re wondering why kosher products are so expensive, here’s your answer! Satellite surveillance! Is this reasonable? I’ve been singing this tune for a while: the Kashrut industry has transformed our obligation from a standard of reasonable reliance to one of empirical kashrut. My understanding of the overall shape of the laws of kosher is that we are permitted to make a broad range of assumptions in determining whether something is kosher. Relying on these assumptions no doubt means that some of the food that enters into our bodies would be not kosher by empirical standard (some quantity of non-kosher molecules, if such a thing could be said to exist, will be eaten) the halacha is clear that the power of the Rabbis to declare something kosher supersedes the physical reality. This is not an uncommon feature of the power of psak.
Unfortunately, the kashrut industry has rejected this approach, and has decided instead ot attempt to meet a standard of absolute, empirical kashrut. While this is no doubt a middat chassidut, and a laudable practice for the especially pious, is this the proper standard for determining mainstream kashrut?
Here’s why I think it is not:
- As we’ve seen over the past year, even reputable and reliable hechsherim have been found to have shocking gaps in their operations, and their ability to enforce compliance has been severely compromised. The Monsey chicken scandal proves, in my mind, that no hashgacha is truly reliable to the level of empirical kashrut. As such, it is both fraudulent and self-defeating to set the empirical standard as normative.
- In personal conversation, anyone involved in kosher slaughter that I’ve ever spoken to has told me that if 70% of what is sold as kosher is, in fact, kosher empirically, it would be a miracle. Given this, who are we kidding by taking pictures of Arab farms from space?
- Empirical kashrut, and its step-sister, Glatt-only hechsherim, place a serious financial burden on the kosher community. If halacha allows us to observe more realistic standards, it behooves us to embrace them, rather than feeding more and more money into the Quixotic quest to achieve a standard not required by God or Halacha.
- How can empirical kashrut be such an important priority? In the days of the Talmud, when merchants tried to gouge Jews shopping for Shabbat, the leaders of the day declared that no person should buy from these merchants, even at the cost of not having fish and meat for Shabbat! Where is that sentiment today? Significant food savings would make an enormous difference for many kosher families, and lower prices for kosher products would enable more Jews to keep kosher, in whole or in larger part.
The madness did not stop with the satellites, however. Evidently, the Star-K is developing a leaf camera(!) that will be able to sort out produce that contains bugs from bug-free produce, based on its ability to detect protein, which is present in bugs, but not in leafy vegetables. Sorry folks, but this sort of thing is what convinces me that the whole system has jumped the tracks, and is careening wildly. The profit motive has replaced the pious motive, and their is no real oversight. The vision of the kashurt industry stands in stark contrast to the vision of kashrut expressed in our Mesorah, and what started as a public service to the community has become a private business supported out of the coffers of the public.
In response, I have decided to become far more liberal about which hechsherim I will accept in my home. If even the best hechsherim are essentially cheating me, by claiming to meet a standard that they do not meet, and if their standards far exceed halachic requirements anyway, why should I support them? Let them make their money off of kosher bleach and paper plates! What do you folks think?
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.


