Gan Eden vs. Olam Habah (The 100th post!)

July 27, 2008 at 1:52 pm | In beliefs, books, orthodox | Leave a Comment

In honor of the 100th post on this blog, I thought we could talk a little bit about redemption.

Underlying most, if not all, religions is the promise of transcendence. This world and our lives have limited meaning, and all will fade in time. Religion offers the possibility of eternal existence and relevance to the individual. Redemption is a related idea. It takes the promise of individual transcendence and applies it to the entire nation of believers, and by extension, to the world.

Judaism has a few different models for redemption, both personal and national. My trouble-making uncle asked me “why do we need olam habah (the world-to-come) if we have techiyat Hametim (resurrection of the dead)? And what does Gan Eden have anything to do with either of those?” Each represents a different point in the spectrum of Jewish beliefs about the afterlife, and the End Times. The truth is that there is tremendous confusion about these terms, and others, like Yemot HaMashiach (The Days of the Messiah), Acharit Hayamim (The Latter Days, or perhaps, the End of Days), Yom Hashem (Day of the Lord), and many others. For an excellent treatment of this topic, I suggest reading Simcha Paull Raphael’s Jewish Views of the Afterlife.

What I want to highlight is that there are different ways to think about redemption. In the Orthodox tradition, redemption is something that happens out of time. It represents the final moment in our linear history, and as such, it is the end to history. As such, the expectations for the Messianic Age are revelation, revolution, and an end to the natural order. For many, the Messianic era is seen as a transition from the physical world to the spiritual world.

My vision for redemption does not discard the physical world. I’m not really waiting for the kind of redemption described above, with its God-like Messiah, anachronistic Temple, and precursor wars and devastation. For me, the Holocaust was war enough, and the Return to Zion was redemption enough. I believe we already live in redemptive times.

My model for redemption is the return to Eden. When Man eats from the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge he becomes discerning, but in so doing he also becomes alienated from everyone. He no longer lives at ease with God, or the Garden, or even Eve, the flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone. Enmity is sown between Man and Man, Man and God, Man and Nature. Our job is to resolve this enmity, and our redemption is restore harmony within God’s creation.

In very real ways, the Jewish nation has been redeemed from the long night of 2,000 years. What remains for us is not to pray for God to descend from on high and shatter the Golden Dome with thunder and lightning. Nor should we pray for Isaiah’s Christ-like
king, or Maimonides’ rabbi-warrior. Surely, we need great leadership, but more than waiting for great leadership to bring change, we need to seize the opportunity to bring the change that too often we only pray for.

Redemption is about a harmonious relationship with nature and our fellow man that enables us to unify with God’s will. We can achieve it in our land, in our own homes, and in our own hearts, but we must share it with our family, our friends, and our neighbors throughout this world if true redemption is to come in this world, not the next.

Who Says You Can’t Imprison the Soul?

September 10, 2007 at 7:23 am | In beliefs, books, politics | Leave a Comment

The federal government is willing to give it a go.

The New York Times reports that the Federal Bureau of Prisons has been purging prison libraries of religious books. Why would the government seek to restrict prisoners’ access to religious books? Apparently, the Justice Department (yes, the same Justice Department headed up first by John Ashcroft and then by since-disgraced Alberto Gonzalez) decided in 2004 that this was a good way to prevent prisoners from becoming terrorists.

The plan, in brief, works like this. First, you select a secret, undisclosed panel of religious experts. Next, you divide the vast religious spectrum into twenty religions or religious categories, and you then dictate that for each category, only 150 books and 150 multimedia resources can be made available. The shadowy panelists make those determinations, with no process for review or appeal of their decisions. Give the whole thing a chilling name like the “Standardized Chapel Library Project”, and walk off saying that you seek to limit prisoners from getting at material that could “discriminate, disparage, advocate violence, or radicalize.”

Needless to say, the government is being sued over this, though experts say that the case is not as clear-cut as outraged progressive liberals like myself may perceive it to be.

Notably, the panel of experts may not be fully representative of the various religions. Of the 120 Jewish books, fully 80 are published by the same Orthodox publisher (the Times doesn’t report which publisher, but I’m sure we can all guess…) I wonder if the Judaism ‘expert’ was a Aish guy.

To me though, the most offensive thing about this is the assumption that lies at the core of the plan: that exposure to religious material breeds terrorism. It’s like the recent drivel by CNN’s resident Antisemite, Christiane Amanpour – a series called God’s Warriors, which profiled terrorists by religious affiliation, including an episode each on Jews, Christians and Muslims. There’s no evidence for the claim, as best as I can tell, that religion drives people to terrorism, any more than there is evidence for the claim that atheism is linked to depression and suicide. But saying something closer to the truth, namely, that Muslim teachers, writings, and role models abound for the would-be terrorist (which is not true of Judaism or Christianity on any similar scale), is a little too judgy for our society. Instead, we have to cloak our desire to limit prisoners’ exposure to a corrosive, ahteful, and dangerous ideology in a more general ban on religious ideas – as though the religion is the common denominator.

Shouldn’t we just limit access to all inciting material in prisons? What precisely is the added benefit of grouping these materials based on a religious dimension?

Reading List

March 8, 2007 at 12:08 am | In books | 3 Comments

After a visit to the YU seforim sale a few weeks back, I find myself with a tremendous backlog of books to get through, and hopefully, blog about. Here’s what’s on my reading list:

And that’s just what I got in English! I also picked up a Yalkut Shimoni, Midrash Tanchuma, and a few interesting Haggadot.

I also want to thank the good people of the Jewish Bible Association for providing free subscriptions to the Jewish Bible Quarterly. Want one? Their website is a little underwhelming, and their order form is not secure, but you can just email info@jewishbible.org and they’ll set you up. I just got my first volume today, and it features articles Hayyim Angel, Shubert Spero, Jacob Chinitz (whose article, “The Role of the Shoe in the Bible” seems of particular interest), and others. All in all, it’s sixty-four free pages by some well-known scholars as well as some obscure voices. We’ll see how it goes, but I’m hopeful.

Any of you out there pick up any good books recently? Let me know in the (woefully underutilized) comments!

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.